The Question Of Animal Rights – A Critique Of Louis Pojman's Thoughts
The Question of Animal Rights – A Critique of Louis Pojman's Thoughts
The fundamentals of philosophy are based upon human beings' ability to examine the "marvels and mysteries of the world" (Pojman xi) we live in. Keeping in mind that only a human being has the intellectual capacity to take on such deliberation, humans should be the sole beneficiaries of any morals or ethical rights derived from philosophical inspection. To suggest the possibility that our ethical rights could be transferable to non-human animals is a direct slap in the face to every philosopher that ever existed.
According to Pojman, ethics include both theory and application. Yet non-human animals do not have the ability to comprehend such complex human theory, nor do they show evidence of applying such theories. Therefore, non-human animals should not be considered to be ethical beings equivalent to humans.
There are those that propose such rationale is faulty if one takes into consideration the......
View the rest of this paper...
Approximate Word Count: 443
Approximate Pages: 2 (250 words per double-spaced page)
Why should you join Frat Files?
- - It's safe, secure, and private.
- - Instant access to over 100,000 papers. New papers are added hourly.
- - Fast and reliable customer support.
Similar Essays
-
The Question Of Animal Rights – A Critique Of Louis Pojman'S ...
The Question of Animal Rights – A Critique of Louis Pojman's Thoughts. The
Question of Animal Rights – A Critique of Louis Pojman's ...
Frat Files
Members
Information
