FratFiles

• Save Paper

In this paper, I will examine Aristotle's understanding of virtue and his explanation of virtuous actions as presented in Nicomachean Ethics. In Book II of the work, Aristotle distinguishes between moral virtues, which are learned through habit and practice, and intellectual virtues, which are learned through instruction. However, it is not until later in Book II that Aristotle actually defines virtue. He opens Chapter 5 with, "Next we must consider what virtue is" (35) and at its end asserts that virtue is a state of character. Therefore, the conclusion of the whole argument is: Virtue is a state of character.
Aristotle first makes the following argument regarding the meaning of virtue: 1) There are only three kinds of things found in the soul: "passions, faculties, [and] states of character" (35); and 2) Virtue is a kind of thing found in the soul. Therefore, virtue is a passion, a faculty, or a state of character.
Having established that virtue is a passion, a faculty, or a......

View the rest of this paper...

Approximate Word Count: 1760
Approximate Pages: 8 (250 words per double-spaced page)

Similar Essays

1. Aristotle's Moral Theory
   

   Aristotle's Moral Theory In this paper, I will examine Aristotle's understanding of virtue and his explanation of virtuous actions as presented in Nicomachean Ethics. In Book II

2. Philosphy
   

   following question: does it make a difference in moral psychology whether one adopts Aristotle's ordinary or Kant's revisionist definition of virtue as habit? Points of

3. Virtue Ethics
   

   Virtue Ethics Introduction Virtue ethics is a theory used to make moral decisions. It does not rely on religion, society or culture; it only depends on the individuals themselves.

4. Virtue Ethics
   

   virtue ethics Virtue Ethics Virtue ethics is a theory used to make moral decisions. It does not rely on religion, society or culture; it only depends on the individuals

5. Grounds Of Law And Legal Theory: A Response
   

   paper in legal and moral theory, delivered in debate with Philippa Foot,1 I explored Aristotle's theory of central cases and focal meanings a little more fully than I did ten years