FratFiles

• Save Paper

The 14th Amendment of the Constitution states that the State shall not deprive any person equal protection of the laws. When equal protection is guaranteed, the outcome must be fair; in other words, substantive justice must be present. Based on this interpretation, McCleskey v. Kemp should be overturned because McCleskey’s death was a racially biased and unfair outcome that was not constitutionally protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Justice Blackmun wrote in his dissenting opinion that in order for McCleskey to prove his innocence and the presence of a racially discriminatory criminal sentencing procedure, he had to meet a three-factor standard. First, he had to prove he was a member of a group that has historically suffered differential treatment. Second, McCleskey had to establish the extent of this treatment. Last, he had to prove that the process by which the death penalty was chosen was open to racial bias. McCleskey met all three prongs of......

View the rest of this paper...

Approximate Word Count: 1716
Approximate Pages: 7 (250 words per double-spaced page)

Similar Essays

1. Interpreting The Mccleskey V. Kemp (1983) Decision
   

   Interpreting the McCleskey v. Kemp (1983) Decision The 14th Amendment of the Constitution states that the State shall not deprive any person equal protection of the laws. When

2. 
   

3. 
   

4. 
   

5.