Saved Papers

Save papers so you can find them more easily!

Join Now

Get instant access to over 100,000 papers.

Join Now!

A Comparison Of Options, Restricted Stock, And Cash For Employee Compensation

A Comparison of Options, Restricted Stock, and Cash
for Employee Compensation
Paul Oyer and Scott Schaefer
September 4, 2003
Abstract
Using a detailed data set of employee stock option grants, we compare observed stock-optionbased
pay plans to hypothetical cash-only or restricted-stock-based plans. We make a variety
of assumptions regarding the possible bene ts of options relative to cash or stock, and then
use observed option grants to make inferences regarding rms' decisions to issue options to
lower-level employees. If the favorable accounting treatment is the sole reason underlying rms'
choices of options over cash-only compensation, then we estimate that the median rm in our
data set incurs $0.64 in real costs in order to increase reported pre-tax income by $1. This gure
is several times larger than the willingness-to-pay for earnings reported by Erickson, Hanlon and
Maydew (2002), who study rms that (allegedly) commit fraud in order to boost earnings. If,......


View the rest of this paper...

Approximate Word Count: 11213
Approximate Pages: 45 (250 words per double-spaced page)

Why should you join Frat Files?

  • - It's safe, secure, and private.
  • - Instant access to over 100,000 papers. New papers are added hourly.
  • - Fast and reliable customer support.

Credit Card

PayPal

Bank Account

Similar Essays

  1. A Comparison Of Options, Restricted Stock, And Cash For Employee...

    A Comparison Of Options, Restricted Stock, And Cash For Employee Compensation A Comparison of Options, Restricted Stock, and Cash for Employee Compensation Paul Oyer and Scott

  2. Ceo Compensation

    (including salary, bonus, restricted stock, and executive stock options), comparison of the restricted stock and stock options, principles of executive pay design, and

  3. Fbt And Esops

    equity. A taxpayer receiving his entire income in cash bears a higher tax burden in comparison to another taxpayer who receives his income partly in cash and partly in kind,

  4. Xto And Devon Energy Comparison

    even higher if it wasn't for an unusually large $33.2 million expense in non cash incentive compensation paid during the quarter. Last year Simpson received $23 million

  5. Tata Corus Merger And Aquisition

    is unspecified. These benefits may include severance pay, cash bonuses, stock options, or other benefits. They are designed to reduce perverse incentives. Proponents of