FratFiles

• Save Paper

Case Identification:
Queens Branch
Keeble v. Hickeringhill 1707,P.31, 11 East 574

Legally Significant Facts:
The plaintiff kept land to raise wild game birds for profit and entertainment.
The defendant discharged shotgun six times at the plaintiff’s pond and scared away birds.
On 3rd and 4th days later defendant returned near the pond, shot gun, and scared away birds.

Procedural History:
Plaintiff claims that defendant attempted to cause damage and loss of profit.
Defendant pleaded not guilty.

Issue:
Did defendant maliciously intend to disturb pond and cause the plaintiff a loss of profit?

Rule of Law:
You cannot maliciously or violently create a disturbance that will cause someone damage to their legal livelihood or profession.

Court’s Reasoning:
If one uses their skills to create a lawful profession or livelihood and you damage their profession you are liable for......

View the rest of this paper...

Approximate Word Count: 243
Approximate Pages: 1 (250 words per double-spaced page)

Similar Essays

1. Keeble Law
   

   Keeble Law Case Identification: Queens Branch Keeble v. Hickeringhill 1707,P.31, 11 East 574 Legally Significant Facts: The plaintiff kept land to raise wild game birds for profit

2. Business Law
   

   ensuring that a plaintiff was not unjustly treated by his being confined to the common law remedy of damages. Two such remedies will now be considered: specific performance and

3. The Scarlet Letter
   

   feudalist revenge tradition continues to be a very harmful barrier, but this unwritten law is only used to safeguard the honor of two big rich families by expressing their

4. Women Labour Force In Europe
   

   (usually supported by the church) was important in implementing the fanny ideal into law. Up to now both economy and state have played a decisive role in the reproduction and

5.