Qb Test
ACCOUNTING II
CLASS PROJECT
GOVERNMENTAL, NON-FOR-PROFIT AND BUDGET
AUGUST 5th, 2008
1. All the cash seems to go to the Teton Valley Health Care Foundation (the Foundation) and all the liabilities to the Teton Valley Hospital (TVH).
2. We discovered that only TVH was being audit but financial information of the Foundation was also included.
3. The TVA is a governmental health care organization.
4. The Foundation is an IRS 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization.
5. The audited balance sheet was dated September 30, 2007 and it appears that the Foundation’s financial information was also as of that date.
6. The figures in the supposed 2009 budget do not appear to be correct.
7. Concerning the audited figures of TVH of September 30, 2007:
a) The bank is over drafted;
b) 23% of its accounts receivable are non-collectable;
c) Deferred Debt Expense – we did not know the meaning of “revenue certificates of participation debt” and we could not find any......
View the rest of this paper...
Approximate Word Count: 548
Approximate Pages: 3 (250 words per double-spaced page)
Why should you join Frat Files?
- - It's safe, secure, and private.
- - Instant access to over 100,000 papers. New papers are added hourly.
- - Fast and reliable customer support.
Similar Essays
-
Qb Test
Qb Test ACCOUNTING II CLASS PROJECT GOVERNMENTAL, NON-FOR-PROFIT AND BUDGET AUGUST 5th, 2008 1. All the cash seems to go to the Teton Valley Health Care Foundation (the
-
What Is Law?
Lindeman v. Colvin (1946) 74 CLR 313 Barnett v. Chelsea & Kensington Hospital [1969] 1 QB 428 2.4.2 Remoteness Test of reasonable foreseeability The Wagon Mound (No. 1) [1961] 1
-
Misrepresentaion
not been made can also be recovered as long as it lies within the remoteness test rule that is, a loss incurred directly as a result of fraudulent misrepresentation
-
Business Law
party may elect to claim damages for negligent misrepresentation at common law. The test of remoteness in the tort of negligence is that the injured party may recover for
-
Civil Liabilitys Act
breached his duty of care towards the plaintiff and damages were suffered. The 'But for' test used proves how the valuer was directly responsible for the damages suffered by the
Frat Files
Members
Information
© 2009 FratFiles.com.