The Relevance Today Of A Jury Of Her Peers
In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan Glaspell illustrates many social standards women experienced at the turn of the century. She allows the reader to see how a woman's life was completely ruled by social laws, and thus by her husband. Glaspell also reveals the ignorance of the men in the story, in particular the sheriff and the county attorney. I think some examples are rather extreme, but in Glaspell's day, they would have probably been common.
Women did not have many rights at the turn of the century. What few rights and freedoms they did have were dominated by social standards. They were expected to cater to their husbands' wishes and commands. I think their society oppressed them more often than their own husbands did. A good example of this in "A Jury of Her Peers" is Martha Hale. Lewis Hale treats his wife as an equal privately, but does not treat her as an equal in public. When Mrs. Hale attempts to interrupt her husband as he tells the county attorney......
View the rest of this paper...
Approximate Word Count: 1060
Approximate Pages: 5 (250 words per double-spaced page)
Why should you join Frat Files?
- - It's safe, secure, and private.
- - Instant access to over 100,000 papers. New papers are added hourly.
- - Fast and reliable customer support.
Similar Essays
-
The Relevance Today Of A Jury Of Her Peers
The Relevance Today of A Jury of Her Peers. In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan
Glaspell illustrates many social standards women experienced ... -
Psychology And Human Behavior
... trial lawyers arguing before a jury, and fund ... can best resolve them have relevance
to diplomacy and ... Today, increasing numbers of psychologists are interested in ...
Frat Files
Members
Information
