12 Angry Men
Generally speaking, an antagonist is a character in a literary work that opposes the protagonist, or chief character. The antagonist can be a person, animal, or force of nature, as long as it provides a source of conflict. Juror Eight could at first be viewed as the antagonist of Twelve Angry Men, because he opposes the votes of the other eleven jurors. However, as the story progresses, Juror Eight establishes reasonable doubt and is able to convince and win over more and more jurors. Eventually, the vote is eleven to one with the majority voting not guilty. Juror Three refuses to be swayed. Thus, he emerges as the main antagonist. I have several arguments on why I believe that Three is the antagonist. Early in the story, the author has given us the impression that Three is a strongly opinionated individual, but he forces his beliefs on others while refusing to listen to what others have to say. The reader is lead to believe that Three has an unconscious grudge against the......
View the rest of this paper...
Approximate Word Count: 270
Approximate Pages: 2 (250 words per double-spaced page)
Why should you join Frat Files?
- - It's safe, secure, and private.
- - Instant access to over 100,000 papers. New papers are added hourly.
- - Fast and reliable customer support.
Similar Essays
-
12 Angry Men
12 angry men. ... 12 Angry Men was remade for television in 1997 and starred George
C. Scott, James Gandolfini, Tony Danza and Jack Lemmon. ... -
12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men. Arthur Mcqueen ... rule. 12 Angry Men, as its title suggests, depicts
a story of exactly 12 men who form such a group. The ... -
12 Angry Men
12 angry men. Monday April 9th, 2007 Criminal Justice Twelve Angry Men
During the course of our class we have encountered plenty ... -
12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men. Characterization ... The film 12 Angry Men relies more heavily on the
use of characterization than any other movie I can think of. Due ... -
12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men. 12 ... 12 Angry Men is an excellent illustration of how evidence
can be misleading without thinking outside the box. If ...
