FratFiles

• Save Paper

In this essay, I will outline Galen Strawson's skeptical view of free will as presented in Robert Kane's book A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. I will attempt to show Strawson's reasoning behind his arguments, and how he believes that his argument holds fast regardless
which side of the fence you fall on in the debate about the truth of determinism. I will define the concept of ultimate moral responsibility (UMR) and show how it plays a fundamental role in Strawson's argument. Finally, I will offer my own criticism of Galen Strawson's view of free will and UMR, and suggest a solution to the problem I bring up.
Galen Strawson is considered a modern skeptic regarding the question of free will. His view is a modified version of a hard determinist claim. Traditional hard determinism is defined by the three theses, "(1) free will is incompatible with determinism, (2) free will does not exist because (3) determinism is true." One main difference between Strawson's thought and......

View the rest of this paper...

Approximate Word Count: 1614
Approximate Pages: 7 (250 words per double-spaced page)

Similar Essays

1. G Strawson And Free Will
   

   G Strawson and Free will In this essay, I will outline Galen Strawson's skeptical view of free will as presented in Robert Kane's book A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. I

2. Free Will: Fact Or Fiction?
   

   only if determinism is false. Determinism's truth would therefore preclude that of free will. Therefore it is difficult for incompatibilists to say what freedom of will

3. The Metaphysics Of John Stuart Mill In Relation To Philippine...
   

   so that we are said to live through a large number of consecutive momentary selves (Strawson 1997). Other philosophers, introspectively exploring the stream of consciousness,

4. 
   

5.