Aristotle Vs Kant
Aristotle's Ordinary versus Kant's Revisionist Definition of Virtue as Habit
L. Hughes Cox
Centenary College of Louisiana
lcox@beta.centenary.edu
ABSTRACT: In what follows I examine the following question: does it make a difference in moral psychology whether one adopts Aristotle's ordinary or Kant's revisionist definition of virtue as habit? Points of commensurability and critical comparison are provided by Kant's attempt to refute Aristotle's definition of virtue as a mean and by the moral problems of ignorance (I don't know what I ought to do) and weakness (I don't do what I know I ought to do). These two problems are essential topics for moral psychology. I show two things. First, Kant's definition is revisionist because he excludes from moral habit-formation what Aristotle includes, that is, (i) practice in prudential calculation of a mean, and (ii) habit-formation by repetition. This follows from Kant's insistence that an act is virtuous only if the moral agent is......
View the rest of this paper...
Approximate Word Count: 3823
Approximate Pages: 16 (250 words per double-spaced page)
Why should you join Frat Files?
- - It's safe, secure, and private.
- - Instant access to over 100,000 papers. New papers are added hourly.
- - Fast and reliable customer support.
Similar Essays
-
Aristotle Vs Kant
Aristotle vs kant Aristotle's Ordinary versus Kant's Revisionist Definition of Virtue as Habit L. Hughes Cox Centenary College of Louisiana lcox@beta.centenary.edu ABSTRACT: In
-
Kant Vs Aristotle
Kant vs Aristotle The Platonic Rationalist and Aristotelian Empirical Way of Thinking Philosophical Inquiry Section ON22 Erich Grunder Jim Cook 3/2/2007 During the 17th and 18th
-
Kant Vs. Virtue Ethics
Kant vs. Virtue Ethics When we talk about whether or not a person is ethically right, we can look at the actions that he or she may partake in. These actions maybe studied in
-
Mill Vs. Kant
Mill vs. Kant In order to Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories we must see which makes a better societal order? John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed in an ethical theory known
-
Emotional Intelligence: The Rapprochement Of Reason And Emotion
since Socrates (469-399 B.C.), the primary focus has been the pursuit of reason. Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) argued that human intellect is "the highest thing in us, and the
Frat Files
Members
Information
© 2009 FratFiles.com.